EAP038 Writing Coursework Task Sheet (Summative)
Assignment:
Write a discursive essay on the following topic (word limit: 1000 words).
“What are the advantages and disadvantages of virtual teams?”
Due Date:
First Draft: 09.00, Monday 4 April 2022 (Week 7)
Final Draft: 09.00, Wednesday 18 May 2022 (Week 13)
All core task requirements must be fulfilled. Failure to fulfil any of the core task requirements means a points deduction from the final assessment grade.
|
Core Task Requirements |
|
Assessment Detail |
All written assessments must use the following formatting requirements.
|
Formatting Requir |
Further Details |
Procedure:
- The language and skills for writing a discursive essay will be taught during W1-W6.
- Source material for the discursive essay will be released in W3.
- A first draft will be started in W3.
- The first draft will be completed between W3 and W6.
- The first draft will be submitted on Monday 4 April 2022 (Monday, W7)
- Tutors will read and make feedback comments on the first draft.
- Tutors will provide written and oral feedback in W11.
- Further instruction, including reflection and responding to feedback, will be conducted in W11.
- The final draft will be submitted on Wednesday 18 May 2022 (Wednesday, W13)
- The Writing Coursework must be submitted to the designated dropbox on the EAP038 Learning Mall page.
Marking and feedback
- The final draft will be assessed based on the marking descriptor at the end of this task sheet.
- Formative feedback will be provided on the first draft in line with university regulations.
Suggestions
- Complete all classroom activities on time – many of the EAP038 classes in weeks 1-6 are based around different sections of an essay. It would be a good idea to work on those sections of the essay in those weeks, while the knowledge you have learnt is still fresh in your mind.
- Plan effectively – reading and making notes on source material requires several hours.
- Additional sources are not required.
- Follow academic integrity requirements – this includes paraphrasing source material and recording the source information (citations, reference list).
- Use academic language.
- Try to submit well before the deadline (in case of technical problems).
Academic Integrity and Late Penalties
Assignments must all be individual pieces of work. Plagiarism and collusion will be penalised. Penalties range from capped scores to an award of 0 (zero) and will apply in instances of:
- Plagiarism - copying words or ideas directly from the source without proper citation.
- Collusion - working with others or copying directly from your peer when you are required to work individually.
This assessment will penalise for Academic Integrity (AI) using the following rules:
- Minor errors with formatting of citations / reference list = AI A Penalty (5% deduction)
- Some of the essay uses uncited words or ideas / words copied or poorly paraphrased from source material / words copied from other students / reference list is missing = AI B Penalty (10% deduction)
- Much of the essay uses uncited words or ideas / words copied or poorly paraphrased from source material
/ words copied from other students = AI C Penalty (possible 0 score)
Please refer to the Academic Integrity Policy Overview Student Version on the Learning Mall EAP038 module page for further details on the above rules and additional rules. It must be noted that AI penalties change according to assessment types. The university uses the online software Turnitin to check your assignments for possible plagiarism and collusion. You will also be able to use this tool before you submit your assignments to ensure, for example, that you did not accidentally copy sentences from a source. Your tutor will tell you more about how to use Turnitin.
- Lateness: Work submitted after the deadline will receive a score deduction of 5% for each day late, up to a maximum of 5 days.
Advanced English Communication & Academic Skills II (EAP038) 2022, Year 1, Semester 2
|
Task |
Organisation |
Vocabulary |
Grammar |
25 |
Some ideas demonstrate in-depth analysis, criticality or insightfulness.
A wide range of source material is aptly chosen and integrated in a sophisticated manner (i.e., the essay flows smoothly between source use and the student’s own words). |
Text is a coherent whole. Uses a variety of cohesive features within and between paragraphs. Any instances of over-, under-, or misuse of cohesive features are rare and minor. |
Uses a wide range of lexis with some precision. Most sentences are error free, and any errors are minor. |
Most sentences are error free, and any errors are minor. Wording is only occasionally awkward. |
20 |
All ideas are well developed.
A range of sources are used to provide main ideas and add clarity in support of main ideas. At least two integration techniques are used. |
Unity is always consistent. Uses a variety of cohesive features. Instances of over-, under-, or misuse of cohesive features are rare and minor. There may be some cohesive links between paragraphs. Both the introduction and conclusion paragraphs are well- structured. |
Range of lexis is wide, allowing for frequent reformulation. Errors with less common lexis may be present, but they are minor. |
Uses a wide range of complex structures. There are frequent error-free sentences, although some wording may be awkward. Errors are minor. |
15 |
All ideas are clear and logical, and most are well developed.
Sources are used to good effect to provide main ideas and/or add clarity in support of main ideas. There may be more than one integration technique. |
All paragraphs have topics sentences that accurately convey the paragraph content and unity is usually consistent. Uses a variety of cohesive features. Misuse is rare, but there may be some over- or underuse. The thesis statement is clear. The conclusion paragraph summarizes most of the essay content. |
Range of lexis is wide enough to allow some reformulation. Errors with less common lexis may be present throughout but do not reduce clarity. |
Range of complex structures allows for a variety of sentence lengths. Errors may be present throughout but do not reduce clarity. |
10 |
The prompt is addressed. Most ideas are adequately developed, but there may be an occasional lack of clarity.
Source use is generally logical and accurate. At least 5 of the provided sources are used. |
Most paragraphs have topics sentences that accurately convey the paragraph content and unity is mostly consistent. Uses a variety of cohesive features with some over-, under-, or misuse, but the ideas are coherently arranged. A thesis statement and conclusion are included. |
Range includes topic-specific lexis, and is wide enough to avoid frequent repetition. Errors with less common lexis are frequent, but rarely reduce clarity. |
Range of complex structures is wide enough to avoid frequent repetition. Errors are frequent, but rarely reduce clarity. |
5 |
The prompt may not be fully addressed. Most ideas are clear, although they may be underdeveloped.
Sources are used to provide or support main ideas, but may be illogical or inaccurate. At least 3 of the provided sources are used. |
Paragraphs may have unclear main ideas and/or may lack unity. Uses some cohesive features, but referencing may be unclear or underused, leading to unnecessary repetition. Transitions may be over- or misused, sometimes reducing coherence. |
Range of lexis is minimally adequate for academic tasks, or the density of errors is high. Errors sometimes reduce clarity. |
Range of complex structures is limited and repetitive, and error density may be high. Errors sometimes reduce clarity. |
|
Points Deductions:
|
Academic Integrity Penalties
|
Each box is worth 5 points (all 20 boxes = 100 points). Markers may award a maximum of 25 points for each column.
Order to get the full answer